Introducing Karen Vermeren

Karen Vermeren is a Belgian artist whose in situ landscapes already caught our eyes some time ago. One rainy Sunday, we met up over tangerines and wine to discuss wanderlust, geology and endeavours of surpassing the usual borders of painting – – – and constructing new ones. 

We were very happy when Karen agreed to join us at Ponyhof.  

Carrara, Delft, Gullfoss, Ithaka, Mingo Falls, Pech Merle, Snežna or Stone Mountain: these are some of the titles of Karen’s exhibitions, named after natural sights she visited or pictures she saw and rendered in her work.

The conscientious art lover may already have located some of these places: the caves of Pech Merle in southern France, for instance, feature in most art history textbooks as the venue where some of the earliest examples of painting were found (which, by the way, represented nothing less than spotty ponies); whereas Carrara, in Tuscany, is famous for its marble quarries which provided, among others, Michelango with material for his ‘David’.

Others are better known as impressive natural sights, such as Snežna, a Slovenian cave whose permanently negative temperature has given rise to astonishing frozen waterfalls; or Stone Mountain, a geologically outstanding (!) monadnock in Georgia, USA (even if this enthralling site also holds a sad connotation in American history as it used to be a place of Ku Klux Klan activities: in his “I have a dream” speech, Martin Luther King proclaimed that “freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia”).

Karen, a keen traveller and recurrent laureate of art residencies, explains that she wants to capture the beauty and mystery of natural landscapes (a genre that seems somewhat undervalued in contemporary art), but also their physical structure and substance, the history and processes that shaped them. She conducts thorough geological research in order to understand how her subjects function and incorporates these insights into her artistic practice.

Karen was trained as a painter but uses walls and windows (or paper) rather than canvas as the support of her work, and turns to tape as frequently as to paint in her practice. However, the way she uses tape — to create depth, to portray the tectonic structure and underlying layers of the mountains — as well as her choice of colours and composition provides her work with a “painterly” impression. Which she maintains herself: “I was trained as a painter and I see myself as a painter.”

I asked Karen how she came to work this way, and she explained that after a course on murals, which she took during an Erasmus exchange in Finland, she started to find canvas too heavy and restrictive and focused on walls instead as she thought they offered her more freedom. She then began using tape in order to frame her murals, to create sharp borders and endings in the walls. Initially she removed the tape but later let it stay, and, over time, more and more tape found its way to her practice.

Stone Mountain in Brussels, 225 x 184 cm, & tape on plastic, ZSenne art lab, Belgium, 2011.

In this painting, representing a cross-section of Stone Mountain, the use of tape creates layers that are suggestive of tectonic plates, as well as the use of colour – pinks and reds which grow more intense downward the mountain, conveying increasing temperature and magma movements.

Furthermore, many of her paintings are in situ projects that include references to the exhibition space, hereby inviting the audience to take notice of the venue and their general surrounding. Her choice of landscape is never treated at random, but always has a special connection with the exhibition space. Walking around one of her shows, I noticed how the works changed depending on my position, and really liked the way that Karen again tests the usual border between work and exhibition space by immersing the latter into the former.

Isola Comacina in Knokke : Acryl & tape on window & plexiglass.

Karen mentions Cézanne and Monet as references, but also Per Kirkeby (don’t miss the Bozar retrospective), who was a geologist as well as a painter; Robert Smithson, the earthworks artist; Katarina Grosse, for her use of colour and light as well as crossing the borders of the frame, exploring space and a liking of corners.

Valdera in de Hortahal, Bozar, Brussels

See more of Karen’s work at our website.

—AEP—

A three course dinner by Jan Offe, or so they wanted us to believe

When we went to have dinner at the excellent Gallery D.O.R. in Brussels a couple of weeks ago, I had no clue we will be creating ourself a canvas almost rivaling with Cy Tombly work! The “three course meal” is the Chapter 3 of Darko Dragičević intervention at D.O.R. During 4 days, every night, an imaginary artist Jan Offe invites guests for a three course dinner. The idea is simple: you all sit together around a table, neither plates, nor cutlery, but instead circles drawn straight on a table clothe/canvas and food stacked directly on it. Guests have to use their finger to eat their food and just freely enjoy their meal. 
The dinner was vegetarian, pretty innovative, Darko Dragičević (b. 1979, Belgrade) sat with us as well as Sverre Gullesen, one of the three Norwegian gallery owners, also performers and John Holten (b. 1984 in Ireland) Irish writer and editor living in Berlin prepare the main course and served us.
Besides the interesting social interactions, guests are gradually aware that their dinner will be one of the 4 canvases presented at the finissage of the exhibition (two other “table clothes” are already hanging on the walls) and guests feel pressure.
The result is signed Jan Offe and entitled Three course meal (2011) mushy peas, tomatoes, onions, red cabbage, red peppers, mash potatoes, salty chocolate, rice cake, pumpkin pudding, red and white wine, cigarettes ashes on canvas. And I swear it was beautiful. Just look at the pictures (the little devil appeared accidently, Darko seemed a bit scared at the idea).
All pictures by Darko Dragicevic
Links:
D.O.R. Gallery

Jan de Lauré: A Studio Visit by Joke de Wilde

Super talented photographer Joke de Wilde has made us the honour of taking some pictures of Ponyhof artist Jan de Lauré in his studio in Antwerp, Belgium. I let the pictures speak for themselves. 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Go and discover more of Joke’s work on her blog !

 And Jan de Lauré’s work on Ponyhof Gallery’s website.

Matthieu Ronsse – Une oeuvre. Indeed.

When I got the catalogue of Matthieu Ronsse by the Bonner Kunsterverein (I have to speak once about the great German Kunstverein) I was almost as excited as when I received the serigraphy of Matthieu Ronsse from them. I thought this very beautiful object was also giving a rather faithful impression of the oeuvre of Belgian painter Matthieu Ronsse. But yesterday was the opening of a new exhibition at Almine Rech…followed later by a very “pleasant” performance.  And I realised that no catalogue, however faithfully and beautifully made, can render the experience of visiting a Ronsse exhibition and even less attending his concert- performances. 

Courtesy Galerie Luis Campania (Berlin)

Matthieu Ronsse is part of the young generation of Belgian painters that comes after the “Flemish wave” of painters such as Raoul de Keyser, Luc Tuymans and embodied by Michael Borremans, Jan van Imschoot or Joris Ghekiere. A wave that found the courage to make “beautiful” paintings in a context where painting itself still is taboo. A new generation that has little sympathy for conceptual thinking, but seeks to produce beautiful, yet interesting work, and by this they meant the painterly qualities of the work but also the ability to convey mystery and attraction.
Courtesy Hoet Beckaert Gallery (Ghent)
As Stephan Strsembski says in his introduction to Ronsse’s catalogue, “it is effortless to look at but very hard to analyse, to grasp, on the first look”. If Ronsse skillfully mixes high art and the trivial, faithful to the heritage of pop culture, there is something more about him.

His painterly proficiency enables him to master a variety of medium pigments, industrial laquers, dust, ashes, chewing gums and oil, but always used with dexterous technique. His oeuvre is all about the painting process, which steers him towards an end results but does not always reach any. It happens that in the course of this process he damages or destroys paintings, but this is still part of his work.
Courtesy Bonner Kunsteverein
Whereas he makes continuously strong references to art history, he completely disreguards any conceptual underpinning in his work. Matthieu Ronsse dares to go to the sources of art, to convey an intuitive personal expression of himself which has a universal reach, which everyone can understand and feel. This is why his work is so hard to analyse.

Matthieu Ronsse, Towerplace, 07.10 - 05.11.2011, Almine Rech Gallery Installation view Courtesy Almine Rech Gallery

So go quickly to Almine Rech Gallery if you happen to be in Brussels before 5 November. Or else just watch this film I took yesterday at the concert at Le Petit Canon, it will give you an idea of the process of Matthieu Ronsse….

 Almine Rech 07 october – 05 november 2011 (Project Room – Brussels)

Ponyhof ZondagsGalerij #3: Wouter van de Koot “The Switch”

Ponyhof Gallery shows for its third edition of its ZondagsGalerij works of Wouter van de Koot, who graduated in painting from the Academy of Fine Art in Utrecht (The Netherlands) in an exhibition titled “The Switch”. This exhibition follows  “Cheating Changes” the first Sunday Gallery, a group show with Céline Felga, Jens Hesse and Joseph Jessen, and the second one “Decorative Violence”, a solo show of Valerie Dubois.

The show aims to unveil his process in reproducing images that he initially staged himself and always seeks to re-use.  The exhibition is also meant to be a challenge for the viewer to follow Wouter in his process, to compare the pictures with one another and to make the visual switch.

Van de Koot’s  re- working of an image enables him to take distance and to treat the initial personal and emotionally laden subject matter more and more like an object. In this process he diminishes or sublimates the role of subject in such a way as to allow form a chance to take center stage. In essence, form becomes the subject. He wants to see how far he can get towards the abstract without losing his own feeling with the image.

“Oh my, there are paintings everywhere!”

…is the sentence I have been repeating the whole day. This weekend was Brussels Art Days, and at my grande surprise, all I saw in downtown Brussels was paintings. I remember three or four years ago going to the Prix de la Jeune Peinture Belge (literally the Prize for Young Belgium Painting) and barely recollect seeing a single painting. This year, there was almost a prominency for painting in Downtown Brussels.  So yes, painting seems to be back for now – you never know painting keeps dying and resurrecting – and it’s not abc berlin contemporary “about painting” which will contradict this, and Ponyhof is happy about it!

Michael Van den Abeele (11 September – 1 November at Elisa Platteau & Cie)

Michael Van den Abeele - Verschijning van het zeldzame aan het veelvoorkomende, 2011 Oil on canvas 89 x 116 cm

David Brian Smith and Oliver Perkins (11 September – 28 October at Galerie VidalCuglietta

David Brian Smith - My soul hath a remembrance and is humbled in me II (2011), Oil on herringbone linen, 180 x 150

Sergej Jensen (10 september to 15 October at Dépendance)

Sergej Jensen - untitled (2009) 55 x 50 cm

Charlotte Beaudry (10 September to 22 October  at AliceDay)

Charlotte Beaudry - Untitled (2011), oil on canvas and wall, 40 x 30 cm

Painted images and Photography: When painting relies on digital media (III)

EBERHARD HAVEKOST works as many of his contemporaries at the intersection between photography and painting, abstraction and representation. He bases his work on preexisting pictures (photographs or video found around, in films, on the internet or made by himself), like many do. What I find interesting is that he digitally reworks the images he finds or takes in order to distance the final painted work towards the original source. But most interestingly, it also reveals the interdependence between the traditional medium of painting and new digital media and techniques. Painting, which claims a regained privileged status towards the overabundance of photographs and films also seems to need to build on them.  And Havekost is not the only one to work like this!

Eberhard Havekost (2010) Flatscreen 2 (1,2,3) B 10, oil on linen, each 109 x 69 cm (Courtesy Robert & Tilton)

Eberhard Havekost re-works digitally images by reducing, enlarging, cropping, stretching and even blurring them. His painted images essentially mimic conventions of photography in their use of close-ups and cropping. However, the image is always recognisable and identifiable, the process is rather subtle and is never so extreme to distort completely the images.  His choice of images seem random and of a deliberate banality. In the vein of Luc Tuymans, Havekost seeks to reinforce the idea that images remain indeed just a representation of reality, no matter how real they seem.

Wouter van de Koot, Into the Hills (2011) oil on canvas, 105 x 80 cm (Ponyhof Gallery)

Similarly but with a completely different goal and result, WOUTER VAN DE KOOT also digitally reworks images that he originally took himself or had taken. He re-enacts a emotional event, such as the birth of his son, by staging himself in position evoking this event. The picture is a first time painted to reproduce it quite accurately and skillfully in watercolour, oil or indian ink. But then he developed a process of reworking the same images again and again, cutting and taping parts, scanning and enlarging them, turning them black and white, modifying the colours to obtain in the end an image highly distanced from the source image. This process enables the artist to destitute the image of its emotional charge and treats it as an object. 

Jens Hess, Bathers (2010), oil on curdoroy, 195 x 110 cm (Ponyhof Gallery)

This reliance of painting on digital techniques is even more perceptible in the work of  JENS HESSE which use digitally distorted image to distance himself from reality and show the shortcomings of the flawless digital world in which we are plunged. He often uses curdoroy or other relief  material to render the LCD vertical lines whilst giving thick brushstrokes at some point to remind that it is a painting with all of its subjectivity and not a simple representation of the image.
See painting of the month Wouter van de Koot.

ZondagsGalerij #2: DECORATIVE VIOLENCE soloshow of Valerie Dubois

Painted images and photography: Painting after Richter and Morley…. (II)

There is another thought I would like to share today with you, following the reading the enlightening article of Barry Schwabsky on Painting at the Age of the Image: how contemporary painting has built up on the heritage of photography, but also went further than simply reproducing a category of images, as Gerhard Richter or Malcom Morley did at their time.

Malcolm Morley (2004) Tackle

According to Barry Schwabsky, artists such as Gerhard Richter and Malcom Morley pursued in essence similar goals as pop artists by choosing the image-realm over some other reality. Whether it is photographs, chosen by those two or comics chosen by Roy Lichtenstein, billboards by James Rosenquist or news snapshots by Andy Warhol, all are clearly limited categories of image material. This very choice was a polemic one, which painters today are no longer busy with.

The difference with contemporary painters, such as Peter Doig, Marlene Dumas and Luc Tuymans to quote only but some of the most influential ones, is that they work in complete detachment from the photographic experience, they do not feel the need like Richter or Morley to represent the seamless “look” of the photograph. The major difference is that the painting remains painterly.

Marlene Dumas (2003) The Kiss

What is engrossing with today’s painting is that painters, although they paint with an aggregate of images, do no longer paint with neutrality but with engagement far from a certain aesthetic distance. They add their emotional stance by freely reinterpreting the photographic image. Situated between the the homogeneity of photography and the heterogeneity of collage, which often are the basis of their work, young painters treat the world they paint as a wholly image.

Céline Felga (2011) Untitled (Drawing and Collage)

 

“An art that eats its own head – Painting in the Age of the Image” by Barry Schwabsky

Painted images and photography (Part I)

In La carte et le territoire (Prix Goncourt 2010), Michel Houellebec portrays a fictive artist Jed Martin who made a painting of him – he staged himself as one of the main characters of the novel. In the book, Houellebec says that out of all the numerous photographs taken of himself, only one portraits will remain over the years and decades and it will be the one painted by Jed Martin. That same portrait which eventually – fictively – will cost him his life. But I’ll stop here in case you still want to read that book. So again the same question comes up, what is it that makes people nowadays engage with painting as a medium when there are so many exciting other media out there such as photography or video? I read recently interesting articles that clarified my thoughts on the articulation between painting and photography and video making. Again, I must repeat it is not about ranking one medium above another but to question the choice of contemporary artists for such medium in comparison to others.

 Upon the invention of photography, few gave much about painting being able to capture with so much precision and accuracy the subject-matter. Photography was seen as having a causal effect from the reality to the image and benefitted from “indexical quality”.

Painting was thus seen as threatened by photography which “withdrew from it the task of representation” and which thereby fully allowed the development of abstract painting  (this is however of course contested in art history – things are never so simple – if you consider for example the Impressionists who already made a substantial move away from pure representation). Malevitch, Rothko, Mondrian, to quote only but a few of the grand abstractionists, have shown that painting could have quite some other function than being a form of representation. “No, as Yves-Alain Blois jokes in his well-known essay Painting as Model, there is no solar eclipse in Malevitch’s Black Square or New York subway map in Mondrian’s Broadway Boogie Woogie…” (Barry Schwabsky).

Mondrian (1942) Broadway Boogie Woogie

But to come back to the relationship of painting with photography, after a generation showing a limited realm of chosen images, such as Gerhard Richter accurately reproducing the seamlessness of the photographic image, painters started to capitalised over the insufficiency of photography.

Gerhard Richter (1988) Betty, Oil on canvas, 101.9 x 59.4 cm

With the overabundance of photography and moving images in this world, photography and video have quickly shown their limits and lost their value. “Not being remembered at all: this has, in the end, been the fate the subjects of most photographs argues Geoffrey Batchen, photography historian, for whom ‘straight’ photograph has always been an insufficient vehicle for memory.

Contemporary painters use paintings’ almost unlimited abilities to add “material sensuality, tactility and atmospheric possibilities” (Alison M. Gingeras). If in the old times, painters were trained to reconstruct pictorially what they saw with their eyes, whereas contemporary painters “work a reality that is already image” (Barry Schwabsky).

Jan de Lauré (2011) James

The imprecision of the painting brush actually corresponds to inaccuracy of the brain’s mnemonic functions. If a photograph is rather very faithful to what one sees, painting plays a better role in triggering free play of association and reminiscences through its subjectivity and its lack of  “pictorial authority and truth-telling capacity (which pertains to) photography”.

Greet van Autgaerden (2009), Kamp 5, Oil on Canvas, 180 x 200 cm (Ponyhof Gallery)

In a world over-saturated with “camera-made images, hyperrealistic forms such as photography and film have become banal and ineffective. Painting has regained a privileged status”, argues Alison M. Gingeras. “The medium’s tactility, uniqueness, mythology and inherent ambiguities has allowed painting to become an open-ended vehicle for both artist and viewer to evoke personal recollections, to embody collective experience and reflect upon its own history in the age of mechanical reproduction.”

Go to  Jan de Lauré on Ponyhof Gallery

Go to Greet van Autgaerden on Ponyhof Gallery

“An art that eats its own head – Painting in the Age of the Image” by Barry Schwabsky

 

“The Mnemonic Function of the Painted Image” by Alison M. Gingeras

“Painting as Model” by Yves-Alain Blois